2011-01-14

Shurangama Qingx (zi-19)


Vuddyy qycjaiww qra Ananda qongw, "Dyrr cincniu liw soxx qongw :ee, narr lirkuix itcer henrsiong, byy jit xee jinglen ee qnir lingrgua u qaqi ee vunxsingr. Anxnex liw soxx qiw hiaxee henrsiong lairdew, byy jit xee si qnir ee vunxsingr. Jitmaw qycc qra liw qongw. Liw qapp Zulaii dirr Jeta Nxaa decc jre, qycc knuar diyc ciurnaa, simrjiww zidtauu qapp guehniuu. Jiongxjiongw henrsiong longxx byy qang, vitdnia byy jit xee jinglen ee qnir si liw tangx qiw .cud .laii .ee. Jiaxee henrsiong liw qycc kir kingqiur, dycc jit xee m si qnir?"
Ananda qongw, "Jitt xee Jeta Nxaa guaw siwqer qra knuar, m jaix hitt lairdew dycc jit xee m si qnir? Sniaxmih enqor? Narr ciu-aw m si qnir, anwjnuaw qongw qnir diyc ciu-aw? Narr ciu-aw dyrr si qnir, anwjnuaw qycc qongw si ciu-aw? Zucuw, simrjiww qongw kongbuu m si qnir, anwjnuaw qongw qnir diyc kongbuu? Narr kongbuu dyrr si qnir, anwjnuaw qycc qongw si kongbuu? Guaw qycjaiww suniuu, jiaxee banrsiong lairdew, narr siongser jimjiog kingqiur, byy jit xee m si qnir ee vunxsingr."
Vuddyy qongw, "Byy m driyc, byy m driyc."

(Shurangama Sutra, Volume 2 --19)
The Buddha further said to Ánanda, "It is as you have said.  No seeing-essence that would have a nature of its own apart from all phenomena can be found. Therefore, all the phenomena you point to are phenomena, and none of them is the seeing. Now I will tell you something else: as you and the Thus Come One sit here in the Jeta Grove and look again at the groves and gardens, up to the sun and moon, and at all the various different appearances, having determined that the seeing-essence is not among anything you might point to. I now advise you to go ahead and discover what, among all these phenomena, is not your seeing."
Ánanda said, "As I look all over this Jeta Grove, I do not know what in the midst of it is not my seeing. Why is that?  If trees were not the seeing, why would I see trees?  If trees were the seeing, then how could they also be trees?  The same is true of everything up to and including emptiness: if emptiness were not the seeing, why would I see emptiness?  If emptiness were the seeing, then how could it also be emptiness? As I consider it again and explore the subtlest aspects of the myriad appearances, none is not my seeing."
The Buddha said, "So it is, so it is."

(楞嚴經卷第二之19)
佛復告阿難。如汝所言。無有見精。離一切物。別有自性。則汝所指是物之中。無是見者。今復告汝。汝與如來。坐祇陀林。更觀林苑。乃至日月。種種象殊。必無見精。受汝所指。汝又發明此諸物中。何者非見。阿難言。我實遍見此祇陀林。不知是中何者非見。何以故。若樹非見。云何見樹。若樹即見。復云何樹。如是乃至若空非見。云何見空。若空即見。復云何空。我又思惟。是萬象中。微細發明。無非見者。佛言如是如是。

沒有留言:

張貼留言